What is this thing, Hashkafa?
If there were no religious criteria for marriage short of “Torah observant Jew,” or “not,” we’d have a much easier time matching people up. But people quibble about the details, and these details are conveniently packaged into something called “hashkafa.” Amongst the things that fall under the realm of hashkafa are: television/movies/videos, various gradations of non-Jewish music (and Jewish music), media acknowledged, internet, time spent learning, shirt color, location and color of yarmulke, etc. None of these things are inherently religious matters, but to many, they make all the difference in the world.
I’ve been mulling over why. Maybe it’s obvious, but I can be a bit slow about some things, so bear with me.
It seems to me, that when it comes to religion, people have a comfort zone. “This is what I’m used to and this is where I’m used to drawing the line,” type of comfort zone. Someone who has never even used email draws the line at no internet. For them, crossing the digital divide is a journey fraught with religious uncertainty. Internet has not been part of their heretofore kosher life, and therefore, they don’t know how to deal with it. When in doubt, “al ta’amin biatzmecha,” so they keep away. Others believe that life is meant to be lived normally, while treading carefully on the safe side of the line. These people use internet with safeguards and filters. Then there are some who point out that you can’t hide forever, that you need to learn to keep a handle on yourself, and that there’s no greatness in having bechira if you don’t use it. These people prefer to surf unrestrained, and learn from any mistakes.
There aren’t many, if any, halachos of internet to broach or obey, yet people trying to maintain their religious integrity have difficulty moving from group to group. They haven’t been trained to live that way. It feels alarmingly free or unnecessarily constrained. They’re used to drawing the line in one location, and aren’t comfortable moving it too far.
And I’m betting that’s how it is in most “hashkafa” cases. It’s just a matter of where you draw your lines, and how far you’re willing to move them for the sake of a partner. Someone with no internet may be willing to have filtered internet as might someone with free-ranging internet habits, but rarely will someone with none feel comfortable moving to free-range, and the reverse.
…And that, folks, was Bad4 coming to terms with the necessity of hashkafic comparisons.
Amongst the things that fall under the realm of hashkafa are: television/movies/videos, various gradations of non-Jewish music (and Jewish music), media acknowledged, internet, time spent learning, shirt color, location and color of yarmulke, etc. None of these things are inherently religious matters, but to many, they make all the difference in the world.
Many of those issues have Halachic implications.
Comment by Nephtuli — March 5, 2008 @ 9:57 am
It seems to me, that when it comes to religion, people have a comfort zone. “This is what I’m used to and this is where I’m used to drawing the line,” type of comfort zone.
The problem is, nobody wants to get married outside their comfort zone.
This is of course, a relatively new phenomenon.
Comment by Lawyer-Wearing-Yarmulka — March 5, 2008 @ 10:03 am
The problem is, nobody wants to get married outside their comfort zone.
People use minutia as proxies. Someone who has unfettered internet access is probably the type of guy who follows sports, reads newpapers, has an interest in secular studies, etc. Since dating periods are so short, people almost have no choice but to use proxies. The question is then why not marry someone who follows sports? Because many Yeshivish girls and guys are told their entire lives that these things are evil, and it’s hard to shake that.
Comment by Nephtuli — March 5, 2008 @ 10:08 am
The question is then why not marry someone who follows sports? Because many Yeshivish girls and guys are told their entire lives that these things are evil, and it’s hard to shake that.
And that’s the real problem.
Comment by Lawyer-Wearing-Yarmulka — March 5, 2008 @ 10:32 am
most of the time interst in sports does NOT indicate interest in secular studies.
Comment by yoni — March 5, 2008 @ 11:06 am
Bad4,
Can you do a post on the length of dates in the yeshivish world? Like 1st date should only be an hour and half etc. Would be interesting….
Comment by A little off topic.... — March 5, 2008 @ 11:08 am
Sort of like buying a car. Some people are more interested in what is under the hood; how powerful is the engine, how easy to maintain, what’s its safety track record etc. Others buy a car based solely on the options: how many colors does it come in, what are the seats made of, does it have automatic windows etc. I guess that those options equate to hashkafah in many cases. They aren’t what makes a car a good car but people want them anyway. And then there are the people who buy the car because it is blue and never bother to check the engine at all.
Comment by profk — March 5, 2008 @ 11:39 am
Nice post
Does the last sentence reveal your personal feeling, or just explain why others see the lines as necessary?
Comment by SIS — March 5, 2008 @ 12:09 pm
Profk – I like the car analogy. All I’m lookig for in a car is good engine, good brakes, good suspension, and a 4-6 body trunk. Everything else is negotiable.
Comment by Ben — March 5, 2008 @ 12:39 pm
The standard answer to is:
Halacha tells you what to do in a certain situation, hashkafa tells you whether you should be in such a situation in the first place.
Example: I work with non-Jews. Sometimes we have meetings and the like at non-kosher restaurants. Halacha tells me whether I can enter the restaurant, whether I can drink water, whether I can order undressed salad, etc.
My hashkafa tells me to get a job, to create in HaShem’s world, to value the general studies that are part of my job and to be an or lagoyim. At times that requires that I contemplate entrance into non-kosher restaurants. Certain people’s hashkafa would tell them that they should never be in the situation where it would come up that they may even think about such a restaurant.
Comment by Elitzur — March 5, 2008 @ 1:34 pm
“All I’m lookig for in a car is good engine, good brakes, good suspension, and a 4-6 body trunk.” YOU ARE A SICKO! You’ll deserve what you get…good luck.
Comment by Anonymous — March 5, 2008 @ 1:39 pm
anon-
I presume you are judging on my units of measurement for the trunk – I’m not planning on moving bodies in it, it is just a unit of volume in common usage in certain professions. But way to make judgments on single line.
Let me do the same. Go take your pills.
Comment by Ben — March 5, 2008 @ 2:15 pm
Ben, I think anon thought 4-6 was referring to dress size.
Comment by Lawyer-Wearing-Yarmulka — March 5, 2008 @ 2:24 pm
LWY, yes, that’s what I thought. If that’s not what you meant, Ben, I apologize.
Comment by Anonymous — March 5, 2008 @ 5:54 pm
I think following sports is a normal, healthy outlet for most frum guys if it isn’t extreme.
As far as the music, this might sound petty, but many couples spend a lot of time in the car together. Realistically, you won’t be talking the WHOLE time. I think you kinda have to agree on the music.
Comment by Michelle — March 9, 2008 @ 6:51 pm
i think the color of the car and its options do have a part in the car i canlearn alot aboutt a car by its external apperiance for example if i see a car that has GPS (built in ) or has mp4 (built in)i can say that this cars is not older than 5 years etc same with a person
Comment by Anonymous — August 23, 2008 @ 5:24 pm