I was reading this post by FnF about being a different person at work and on a date. And my gut reaction was, “I sooo disagree.” Then I realized that my disagreement didn’t mean much, as I’m still single. And then I realized that her statement didn’t mean much either, because she’s also single. (But seriously, FnF – you were exaggerating, right?)
Now, don’t get me wrong. One wants to be more businesslike at work and more personable at play. But pretending to be a soft, silly, feminine thing when you’re not is bound to fail in one way or another. Either you’ll bore him, because he wants someone with a drop more spine; or you’ll fail, because you can’t hold the charade that long (my problem); or you’ll dump him, because you can’t envision spending your life with the kind of guy who wants a milksop hanging off his arm.
I have definitely tried both tacks. Indeed, I start out by being mild and agreeable. This, I think, is generally advisable when you’re spending time with someone you don’t know very well (or at all). We have long ago established the disaster that can ensue when someone lets their personality unchecked liberty, without consideration for the opposite party. But even when I’m mild and agreeable, I’m not awfully feminine. My handbag doesn’t sit in the crook of my elbow, and I tend to walk at NYC sidewalk speed, which sometimes leave the OOT guys behind. But otherwise, I’m definitely more charming than I tend to be IRL.
But I’ve yet to go out with a perfect guy, and the best laid plans of mice and men go awry. (I date men.) And having that wonderful, Jewish attribute of mercy (is it also feminine?), I can’t bear to see a guy flounder. So I’ll suggest a restaurant that doesn’t have a line out the door, a museum that is actually open, an attraction that has its own parking lot, a good place to walk that isn’t littered with sunbathers, or whatever is necessary. And I’m afraid that once that ruthlessly efficient genie starts peeking out of its lamp, it is perishing difficult to squish it back in.
I mean, is there a feminine way to give a guy directions?
Hm. Probably. The GPS does it. I guess I can cultivate a husky, musical voice and practice making imperatives sound like suggestions. It must be something in the inflection. That way of saying, “Turn left” and lifting the tone at the end oh-so-slightly… Or would sounding like a GPS make me seem more mechanical and less “feminine”?
What on earth is “feminine” anyway? At least we can say that the “gentleman” is some sort of idealized archetype. But isn’t there some rule that feminine is as feminine does? Come on: we all know that femininity today is something quite different than in days of yore. Case in point: I’ve got this multi-function tool in my handbag. It’s a pliers, officially, but the guys at Gerber decided to make it more useful by sticking extra functional gewgaws into the handle. So in one handle they put the always versatile blade and screwdriver. But then they were stumped about what to put in the other handle. The committee sat down to ponder the question: what does the kind of person who carries a pair of pliers and a knife really need most in the course of a day?
The answer, of course, was a nail file.
But back to the problem of taking charge while trying to seem pliable and admiring and feminine…
(Why do I have this feeling that I’ve written about this already? Because I have… Femininity over here.)
And about sounding smart: so, yes. I’ve had trouble there. But there were many more times when the guy was gratified to have someone who not only understood what the heck he was talking about, but could also ask intelligent questions on the subject (!!). It should be noted that the sort who found smartness disconcerting were not generally the high-power yeshiva guys. They were usually the low-end of both yeshiva and college types. Keen minds appreciate keen minds. It’s only the humbugs who feel insecure.
I’ve got a friend who can go on for a solid half hour about the medical aspect of varicose veins. This does not – I must point out – detract from her femininity; she is among the more feminine people I know. She just happens to be obsessively inspired by the sort of medical details most of us would prefer not to think about. When she gets started about medical nomenclature for holes in the heart, I find it riveting. So does her husband. Not because we’re absorbing much, but because it’s fascinating to listen to someone who is really and truly enthusiastic about what she’s saying. And this will work for any person and any of their interests. (The friend who walks around with a camera stocked with photos of epithelial tissue is also married. Just goes to show.) If someone likes you, they’ll be fascinated by the things you’re fascinated with. Or just fascinated by your fascination. Either way, it’s irrespective of the subject.
Now that point about agreeing with everything he says – hold fire. I think that deserves a post of its own.